LCCC ENGLISH DAILY NEWS BULLETIN
March 09/08

Bible Reading of the day.
Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ according to Saint John 7,40-53. Some in the crowd who heard these words said, "This is truly the Prophet."Others said, "This is the Messiah." But others said, "The Messiah will not come from Galilee, will he? Does not scripture say that the Messiah will be of David's family and come from Bethlehem, the village where David lived?" So a division occurred in the crowd because of him. Some of them even wanted to arrest him, but no one laid hands on him. So the guards went to the chief priests and Pharisees, who asked them, "Why did you not bring him?" The guards answered, "Never before has anyone spoken like this one." So the Pharisees answered them, "Have you also been deceived? Have any of the authorities or the Pharisees believed in him? But this crowd, which does not know the law, is accursed." Nicodemus, one of their members who had come to him earlier, said to them, Does our law condemn a person before it first hears him and finds out what he is doing? They answered and said to him, "You are not from Galilee also, are you? Look and see that no prophet arises from Galilee." Then each went to his own house,

Free Opinions, Releases, letters & Special Reports
Hezbollah gets a billion dollar subsidy from Iran. By: Dr. Walid Phares.International Analyst Network 08/03/08

Slaughtering civilians does nothing to serve the Palestinian cause-Daily Star- 08/03/08
Syria's summit hopes-Al-Ahram Weekly. 08/03/08
International Christian Concern (Release): Muslim Radicals Kill Three Christians and Wound Dozens in Southern Ethiopia 08/03/08

Latest News Reports From Miscellaneous Sources for March 08/08
Washington Ready for War with Syria to Defend Lebanon?Naharnet
Egyptian official: Syria may be behind Jerusalem attack-Jerusalem Post
Franjieh's Barter Deal: 1960 Law for President-Naharnet
Syria Accuses US of Destabilizing Lebanon and Saniora Advises ...Naharnet
Lebanon: Middle East microcosm-Globe and Mail
Hezbollah accuses US of declaring war on Lebanese opposition-Xinhua
N. Korea Hopes for Friendship With Syria-The Associated Press
Jumblat: Jerusalem Raid is Normal Reaction to Gaza Crime-Naharnet
Fatfat: Lebanon May Elect President on March 25-Naharnet
Justice Minister Discusses International Tribunal with U.S. Diplomat
-Naharnet
Geagea On Official Visit to United States-Naharnet
Welch Attacks Syrian Regime, Says Damascus Working Against Peace
-Naharnet
Muslim Spiritual Leaders Denounce Israeli Crimes
-Naharnet
Qabalan for the Election of President
-Naharnet
PM Saniora: Lebanon to be Invited to Arab Summit after March 11
-Naharnet
Fadlallah Calls Jerusalem Attack 'Heroic'
-Naharnet
US to place ships stopping in Syria on watch list-AFP
Hamas claims responsibility for Jewish school shooting-Star Staff
Two Israeli warplanes fly over Beirut -Daily Star
French foreign minister says Lebanon crisis can 'only be blamed on the Lebanese-Daily Star
SYRIA - LEBANON-France24
Stop war” = “back Hezbollah”?Workers' Liberty
Council of churches slams abduction of bishop in Iraq-Daily Star
'March 14 refuses to deal with Syria constructively'-Daily Star
'Lebanon must agree on representation at Arab summit-Daily Star
Arab Human Rights Fund launched in Beirut-By Anthony Elghossain
Women stabilizing an insecure world -By Benita Ferrero-Waldner and Margot Wallstrem
Controversial editor of Hezbollah’s newspaper, Ibrahim Mousawi ...gair rhydd - Cardiff,UK
The Care and Feeding of an Angry Territory-National Review Online
Middle East: Gunman who killed students previously arrested for for Hezbollah ties-Âßí - Italy
Arab leaders threaten to boycott Damascus summit-International Herald Tribune
Drought-hit Cyprus seeks water from Lebanon-AFP
Total non-life premiums in Lebanon see 8 percent rise to $482.65 ...Daily Star
Credit Suisse, Bank Audi wrap up $875 million Eurobond for Lebanon-Daily Star
Iranian cleric says sanctions aimed to disrupt polls-AFP
ISF officer commits suicide while on duty-Daily Star
Putting political differences aside, Lebanese rally against 'Zionist terrorism' in Gaza-By Alexandra Sandels
Muslim clerics slam Israeli attacks on Palestinians-Daily Star
LAU ceremony pays tribute to Mai Ghoussoub-Daily Star
Lebanese women still suffering under outdated laws-AFP

Muslim clerics slam Israeli attacks on Palestinians
By Maher Zeineddine
Daily Star staff
Saturday, March 08, 2008
BEIRUT: Lebanon's leading Muslim figures denounced on Friday Israel's ongoing military operations in Gaza, calling on the UN to consider the attacks "war crimes." "We also denounce the US coverage of the crimes being committed by Israel and attempts to justify them and therefore hamper Israel's conviction by the UN Security Council," said a statement issued following a meeting of top Sunni, Shiite and Druze clerics.
Grand Mufti Sheikh Mohammad Rashid Qabbani, senior Shiite cleric Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, the vice president of the Higher Shiite Council Sheikh Abdel-Amir Qabalan, and Druze community leader Sheikh Naim Hassan met at the Druze sect's headquarters in Verdun to discuss the situation in Gaza.
"We urge the international community to call Israel to account and punish it for committing crimes in Gaza," the statement added.
An Israeli air and ground operation in Gaza has left more than 130 dead, roughly half civilians, since last week.
Meanwhile, Fadlallah said in his weekly Friday sermon from the Imam Hassanayn Mosque in Haret Hreik that the attack on a Jerusalem religious school which left eight dead the previous day was "heroic."
"The heroic operation in Jerusalem has proven that the mujahideen in Palestine are capable of hitting the Zionists hard," Fadlallah said.
"The attack was a natural reaction to the barbaric Israeli violence in the Gaza Strip," Fadlallah added.
Fadlallah also slammed the US administration for its "full" support of Israel and its dispatch of a destroyer to international waters off the coast of Lebanon. "Warships deployed facing the Lebanese coast constitute an attempt to cover the US political and security failures in pressuring the resistance in Lebanon and Palestine," he said. "They also aim to confirm the US' complete support of the Zionist enemy in conducting barbaric massacres against civilians in Gaza and the West Bank."For his part, Qabalan urged the Lebanese to protect their country and work in favor of its interests. "You have to elect a consensus president to represent you in the Damascus meeting," he said in his Friday sermon, addressing Lebanese politicians. "I don't think a certain party wants to marginalize the other. Everybody wants to serve the interests of the Lebanese."He also said officials ought to implement projects to limit unemployment and migration. - The Daily Star, With AFP

Washington Ready for War with Syria to Defend Lebanon?
Naharnet/A recent electronic mail leaked by Egypt unveils U.S. readiness to launch wide-scale military offensive against Syria if the Assad regime sticks to its policy towards Lebanon, Germany's DPA news agency reported. DPA on Friday quoted reliable sources as saying "the e-mail leaked a few days ago by Egypt to Syria reveals that the U.S. is ready to launch a wide-scale military offensive against Syria if (Damascus) holds onto its current position towards the Lebanese crisis."
"This is the main reason behind (the deployment of) the (USS Cole) destroyer off the Lebanese and Syrian coasts," the sources added.
A U.S. Navy official said earlier this week that the Cole had been relieved by the guided missile destroyer USS Ors and the guided missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea. Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters last week that the deployment should not be viewed as threatening or in response to events in any single country in the volatile region. An Nahar daily, however, quoted on Saturday diplomatic sources as saying that "the American message delivered to Damascus means Syrian and Iranian domination on Lebanon is prohibited."An Nahar also said that newspapers in the Gulf have reported that Russian and Iranian naval forces in the Mediterranean sea have been put on alert. Beirut, 08 Mar 08, 07:08

'Syria may be thwarting cease-fire'
By JPOST.COM STAFF
Syria may be attempting to deflect international scrutiny of its actions in Lebanon by thwarting Egyptian attempts to moderate a cease-fire between Palestinian factions and Israel, the London-based newspaper Al-Hayat reported on Saturday. According to the report, a senior Egyptian official told the paper that "Syria may be interested in focusing international attention on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank, instead of the situation in Lebanon." "The current escalation on the Palestinian front is in the interest of the Syrians," the official added. "Indeed the continuation of this situation may embarrass leaders in the Arab world, and force them to go back on their decision to send low-level officials to the Arab Summit, which is set to take place in Damscus." Asked whether Hizbullah was responsible for the Jerusalem shooting spree, the official responded that "there is not enough evidence, but an investigation is ongoing." The official then went on to insinuate that Syria may have had a hand in the attack. "Senior Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders who are able to decide on a cease-fire were in Syria [at the time], and we won't forget that when we hear who was behind the terror attack," he said. The official added that all cease-fire negotiations were frozen following the meeting in Damascus. Meanwhile, Egyptian Intelligence chief Omar Suleiman has postponed a planned trip to Israel following the shooting attack, Army Radio reported on Saturday. This was the second time in two weeks that Suleiman postponed his trip. Last week, Egyptian officials announced that the trip would be postponed due to the IDF operation Hot Winter, which left over 110 Palestinians dead while aiming to curb Kassam rocket fire against western Negev communities.

Franjieh's Barter Deal: 1960 Law for President
Naharnet/EX MP Suleiman Franjieh, who leads the Marada Movement, said the Hizbullah-led opposition is ready to facilitate presidential election if the majority accepted re-adoption of the 1960 general elections law. "Give us the 1960 law and take whatever you want. I can convince my allies in the opposition," Franjieh said in a television interview aired Friday evening. Maronite Patriarch Nasrallah Sfeir and several leaders of the March 14 opposition had rejected re-adoption of the 1960 parliamentary elections law, insisting on a new law based on the concept of one county one constituency. By pledging to facilitate presidential elections in return for re-adoption of the 1960 law, Franjieh dropped a traditional demand by the opposition to control veto powers in the forthcoming government.
Franjieh, a staunch Syrian ally, accused the majority of placing bets on a strike targeting Syria "but they do not realize that whoever strikes at Syria is Lebanon's traditional enemy."The Christians, according to Franjieh, "cannot behave as if Syria and Iran do not exist or as if the west doesn't exist. We are part of the Arab-Israeli conflict and we are part of the conflict between religions and we are part of the orient." Franjieh concluded by admitting that "the general atmosphere is ready for war. The war may not break out, but if a major political personality was assassinated in light of the ongoing tension, then there would be war. That is why we have to consolidate the national unity." Beirut, 08 Mar 08, 10:33

Syria Accuses U.S. of Destabilizing Lebanon and Saniora Advises Against Provoking Israel
Naharnet/Syria has accused the United States of threatening Lebanon's stability at a time Premier Fouad Saniora advised against provoking the "injured tiger" Israel into launching war. The daily al-Akhbar said Damascus made the charge in a message to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon presented by its U.N. ambassador Bashar al-Jaafari. The Syrian message said the deployment of "five U.S. naval vessels off the Lebanon coast under the pretext of safeguarding Lebanon's stability threatens stability in Lebanon and foils UNIFIL's efforts," in reference to the U.N. Interim Force that mans a demilitarized zone south of the Litani River in terrain abutting the Jewish state. The Syrian message said a recent report by Ban on implementation of UNSCR 1701 included "Israeli allegations … regarding the smuggling of weapons from Syria."As for criticism by the Ban report of Palestinian bases in Lebanon, the Syrian message claimed that "Palestinian presence in Lebanon is governed by the 1969 Cairo agreement between Lebanon and the Palestine Liberation Organization and Syria is not involved in such arrangements."
Lebanon abrogated the Cairo Accord nearly 20 years ago. The Syrian message said all Palestinian "positions are on Lebanese territory and Syria is not responsible for any flaw (in the relation) between the two sides."
Syria, the message claimed, is ready to demarcate the joint borders with Lebanon "from the north to the south."It accused Ban of trying to "stir up differences" between Lebanon and Syria, claiming Damascus is ready for normal relations with Beirut "if the Lebanese government is willing."Meanwhile, Saniora was quoted as advising against provoking Israel to launch war, terming the Jewish state an "injured tiger.""It is important not to give Israel any pretext though this doesn't mean that we face an aggression and remain silent," Saniora said. In a related development, government sources said Syria would invite Lebanon to the forthcoming Damascus Summit and that a stand would be adopted on such an invitation after receiving it. Meanwhile, it was reported that Saniora would represent Lebanon at the summit of the Organization of Islamic Conference scheduled for March 13 in Dakar, capital of Senegal. Beirut, 08 Mar 08, 09:16

Lebanon: Middle East microcosm
RAYYAN AL-SHAWAF
March 8, 2008
It is quite fitting that A Mirror of the Arab World: Lebanon in Conflict should be the latest offering by veteran Middle East journalist Sandra Mackey. Her timing is propitious for two reasons: Lebanon is much in the news these days due to continuing domestic turmoil, while the larger Arab world risks being rent asunder by deepening political and sectarian divisions.
Mackey, who has authored previous books on the Arab world, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran and Lebanon itself (Lebanon: A House Divided), now comes full circle, attempting "to observe through the lens of Lebanon many of the dynamics at work in all Arab states." Though the author points out that "Lebanon is not a perfect microcosm of the Arab world," she explains how it alone has experienced almost all the major crises to bedevil the region since the First World War. These include the propensity of sectarian loyalties to trump national identity, the disruptive influence of Palestinian guerrillas, the radicalization of the historically marginalized Shiites, and the widening Sunni-Shiite rift. Alongside her account of the manner in which such enduring phenomena have impinged upon Lebanon's stability, Mackey provides a strident critique of negative characteristics unique to Lebanon.
Chief among these "Lebanonisms" is the role of "a coterie of political bosses" wielding inordinate influence and power. "In Lebanon prior to the civil war of 1975," Mackey writes, "the elite was composed of the zuama, who were to Lebanese society what the feudal lords were to medieval Europe and the ward heelers to American politics." The author notes that even rival zuama would close ranks when faced with any attempt to strengthen the state, which they had effectively supplanted by establishing elaborate patron-client relationships with members of their sect or region.
Yet Mackey is overly critical of Lebanon's confessional system of governance, to which she unfairly ascribes most of the country's ills. Though admittedly skewed in favour of Christians for decades, and always abused by the zuama of all sects, the practice of allocating political office on a sectarian basis ensures the representation of minorities; if anything, it should be broadened to include a quota for women.
Discontinuing institutional confessionalism without replacing it with secularism (rejected by the majority of Lebanese Muslims and some Christians) could easily lead to a measure of Islamization, as the country's Muslim majority would face no restraints on injecting Islam into politics. The real tragedy is that many critics of Lebanon's confessional system depict the 1975-1990 civil war as its logical outcome. This becomes a handy excuse for neighbouring Arab countries - where minorities are often woefully underrepresented - to dismiss proposals aimed at achieving proportional sectarian and ethnic representation.
Mirror also suffers from factual errors. Apart from a brief remark placing the mutasarrifiyya, an Ottoman administrative unit for Mount Lebanon, in the 17th century instead of 1861-1914, Mackey makes several mistakes when discussing recent and contemporary issues. For example: Hezbollah's unprovoked attack on Israel in the summer of 2006 did not occur in the disputed Shebaa Farms region, but in Israel proper; Syria's iron-fisted ruler is named Bashar (not Bashir) Assad, while his father Hafez died in 2000, not 2002; Lebanon's speaker of parliament, Nabih Berri, attended the public Lebanese University, not the private Beirut University College; Armenian citizens of Lebanon are best described as "non-Arab," rather than the author's "non-Lebanese"; and Ragheb Alameh is not "the Lebanese Madonna," but a male pop idol.
Nevertheless, the author's undeniable erudition infuses the book with a depth sorely lacking in most journalistic accounts of the Middle East. Mackey excels when providing historical background to the myriad competing interests that, from 1975 until 1990, turned Lebanon into "a multi-layered battleground on which Christian fought Muslim, the political left combatted the political right, Lebanese engaged Palestinian, Syria sent in its army, Israel ravaged the PLO, a covey of Western countries blundered as peacekeepers, and Iran further politicized the Shia." Postwar Lebanon, characterized by Syrian hegemony until the assassination of former prime minister Rafic Hariri in 2005, also receives detailed coverage, replete with all-too-timely warnings that Lebanon could yet again become the staging ground for inter-Arab conflicts.
Strangely, for all her talk of Lebanon reflecting its neighbours' struggles and dilemmas, Mackey ignores one particularly obvious reflection in the Lebanese mirror: Israel. Though even the most pro-Western Lebanese would likely shudder at the analogy, Lebanon's predicament clearly resembles that of the Jewish state, which "is geographically part of the Arab world and culturally entwined with the West." Yet whereas Israel's politico-cultural leanings have few if any external ramifications (Arab hostility toward Israel stems from its oppression of the Palestinians, not its westward orientation), Lebanon's choices in this arena are often fraught with danger.
Lebanon, after all, is an Arab country whose alliances are of no small importance to its neighbours. A decision to align itself with the West politically or even culturally would provoke the wrath of anti-Western Arabs both inside and outside Lebanon. In the 1950s, '60s and '70s, this meant Sunni Arab nationalists; today, the culprits are Shiite Islamists backed by Syria and non-Arab Iran, or Sunni Islamists inspired by al-Qaeda.
Imagine being embattled Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, tentatively inching his country closer to the West. In order not to offend the powerful Sunni establishment in the Middle East, you must co-ordinate your move with its two pillars: Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Yet to your neighbour Syria, its backer Iran and your own sizable Shiite population - all already uneasy about your overtures toward the West - such a strategy appears to place you squarely on the side of Sunnis and against Shiites in the ever-widening chasm between the two sects. Consequently, you must make concessions to the Syria-Iran-Hezbollah triumvirate.
The result is admittedly very little movement in any direction, but a more single-minded approach would almost certainly trigger conflict. So whatever you do, don't do much, and try to keep everybody happy; directly above you, the Arab Sword of Damocles hangs precariously by a thread, and there are plenty of folks with scissors. **Rayyan Al-Shawaf is a writer and freelance reviewer based in Beirut, Lebanon.

Hezbollah accuses U.S. of declaring war on Lebanese opposition
www.chinaview.cn 2008-03-08 18:36:50 Print
BEIRUT, March 8 (Xinhua) -- A Hezbollah official for international affairs Nawaf Moussawi on Friday accused the United States of declaring war on the Lebanese opposition, vowing to defeat any aggression, state-run National News Agency reported on Saturday. "The U.S. declares an unveiled war on the opposition which represents the majority of the Lebanese people," Moussawi said, stressing that the opposition is capable of confronting any aggression "whether it is political or non political." "The opposition has managed to stop Israel military aggression, and prevented American hegemony," he added, pointing to the July2006 war when Israel, backed with the U.S., launched 33 days of air and land military operation against Lebanon in retaliation to Hezbollah kidnapping of two Israel soldiers from Israeli boarders with Lebanon. "The American hegemony is cracking," he said, and this is why the U.S. sent navy vessels off the Lebanese coast. Hezbollah is considered a main group in the Lebanese opposition, and is accused by the U.S. and its allies to be the primary ally of Iran and Syria in the region.

N. Korea Hopes for Friendship With Syria

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korean leader Kim Jong Il hopes for stronger friendship with Syria, the North's official news agency reported Saturday, amid lingering suspicions of a secret nuclear connection between the two countries. Kim expressed the hope in a message to Syrian President Bashar Assad on the anniversary of a 1963 coup that brought Syria's Baath Arab Socialist Party to power, the North's Korean Central News Agency reported.
"I express my firm belief that the friendly cooperative relations between the two countries will be further expanded and strengthened in various areas," Kim said in the message. The North's No. 2 leader, Kim Yong Nam, sent a similar message to the Syrian president, KCNA said.
North Korea has been suspected of helping Syria with a secret nuclear program. But Pyongyang has strongly denied the accusations, saying it has never spread its nuclear expertise beyond its borders. Syria has also denied receiving any North Korean nuclear help.
The alleged nuclear link is believed to be a sticking point stalling international talks on the North's nuclear programs, along with the communist nation's suspected uranium enrichment program. Under last year's agreement with the United States, China, Japan, South Korea and Russia, the North is required to give a full account of its nuclear programs, including whether it spread nuclear technology beyond its borders. Pyongyang claims it gave the nuclear declaration to the United States in November, but Washington says the North never produced a "complete and correct" declaration. North Korea and Syria established diplomatic relations in 1966.

Jumblat: Jerusalem Raid is Normal Reaction to Gaza Crime
Naharnet/Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblat said Saturday that Israel has no alternative but to recognize the Hamas movement and engage it in dialogue to achieve a settlement. Israel's "persisting efforts to avoid engaging Hamas would yield no results, exactly like striking at Gaza that is not yielding results," Jumblat told the daily as-Safir. He said the attack on the Jewish religious school in Jerusalem was "a normal reaction to the ugly crime committed by the Israeli Army in Gaza." The March 14 majority alliance, of which he is a prominent leader, would adopt a "unified stand in the few coming days" regarding the general election law, Jumblat said without further elaboration on the remark. He refused to comment on decisions adopted by Arab foreign ministers in their latest meeting at the Egyptian capital of Cairo. Beirut, 08 Mar 08, 10:44

Fatfat: Lebanon May Elect President on March 25
Minister of Youths and Sports Ahmed Fatfat said Saturday he is hopeful Lebanon could elect a president on March 25, but failed to back his prediction.
"there is a possibility to elect a president on the 25th of this month. A Miracle could occur that day," Fatfat said in a radio interview. "Lets wait for what would be issued by parliament Speaker Nabih Berri in the next couple of days. If he postpones the forthcoming session to after the 25th it means that I am wrong in my expectation," he added. Fatfat denied reports of a split within Premier Fouad Saniora's Cabinet. "My relations with the cabinet and the premier are more than excellent … as for the relation with the Mustaqbal Movement I do not see myself in the political spectrum outside the Mustaqbal Movement," Fatfat added. He expressed concern that Israel "might be preparing for a major (war) thing, and our only option to confront it is by consolidating our domestic front and electing a president."He criticized the "American style" in declaring the mission of the USS Cole off the Lebanon coast as "useless political stupidity."
Fatfat said Arab foreign ministers have "acknowledged the Lebanese-Syrian problem … this is new."He said Lebanon should not be represented at the forthcoming summit in Damascus unless it managed to elect a president prior to the March 29 schedule. "Our absence (at the summit) wouldn't be a wise policy and our participation without a president is risky," Fatfat said. He said the Arabs "want to help Lebanon because they realize that its collapse means that Iran would have a base in the Mediterranean and because they have no interest in Syria's dominance over Lebanon." Beirut, 08 Mar 08, 14:18

Justice Minister Discusses International Tribunal with U.S. Diplomat
Justice Minister Charles Rizk discussed with U.S. Charge D'affaires Michele Sison on Friday the international tribunal that would try suspects in the 2005 assassination of ex-Premier Rafik Hariri and related crimes. Rizk, in a statement distributed by the state-run National News Agency (NNA) said the discussion "covered the international tribunal that has become a fact, which all should recognize and consider it a means to unite the Lebanese rather than splitting them."
Those who support the tribunal should regard it a judicial institute distanced from politicization while former opponents have started recognizing it as a fait accompli. This is a positive development" Rizk said. The talks with Sison also covered financial backing by USAID to the Lebanese judiciary, the minister added.
Sison said she is "pleased with the level of cooperation and coordination" between the United States and the Lebanese judicial system. She explained that USAID backing to the Lebanese judiciary aims at supporting the "rule of law" that is important to bolstering "democracy and good governance." Beirut, 07 Mar 08,

Stop war” = “back Hezbollah”?
Submitted on 7 March, 2008 - 20:01 SWP Iran Iraq Solidarity 3/128, 6 March 2008
Author: Jack Staunton
Hezbollah were among the organisations represented at the “World Against War” rally in Friends’ Meeting House, London on 25 February, with the Stop the War Coalition seeing fit to give a platform to the clerical fascist Lebanese militia. Reflecting the StWC’s eclecticism, this utter reactionary was speaking alongside Tony Benn, who gave his usual upper-class liberal speech about why the United Nations should be stronger and why we should learn from the Bible’s lessons of contrition. Introduced by Communist Party of Britain member Andrew Murray to rapturous applause from the 250-strong audience, Ibrahim Mousawi shied away from the misogynistic, homophobic, anti-semitic rhetoric which his organisation peddles in the shanty towns of Beirut. Instead, he told us that Hezbollah are oh-so reasonable — “why do the Americans ignore the real terrorists at the expense of us, the bridge-builders?”. Hezbollah are not led by a bunch of gangsters, but “engineers, lecturers and people from all walks of life”. Indeed, Hezbollah are fully willing to arrange a lash-up with the rest of the Lebanese ruling class, for example the pro-Western parties behind Prime Minister Siniora, to resolve the political crisis which has seen the country without a president for three months. He said that all Hezbollah want is to be able to veto anything the government tries to do - isn’t that reasonable? Along with this, Hezbollah are strong proponents of Lebanon’s sectarian political order, whereby seats in parliament are distributed according to religious group and politics is staged at the level of horse-trading between the leaders of competing faith and ethnic communities.
Crashing full frontal into Bond villain-esque self-parody with his long leather coat and black shirt, the speaker — editor of a Hezbollah newspaper and former manager of a TV station which put out soap operas about the Jewish World Conspiracy — claimed that the problem in his country was the lack of a strong government, and argued that since the Lebanese government cannot be relied on to keep order and stand up to the Israelis, Hezbollah have every right to arm themselves and patrol the streets. At pains to deny that he hated the Jews (the western Trots don’t really like that kind of thing, but it’s fine for Lebanese TV), he appealed to “a man’s right to protect his family” from Zionism.
The other speeches were rather less spicy. Lindsey German, the Socialist Workers’ Party candidate for the London mayoral election, gave a dull talk about the hypocrisy of the British establishment and echoed much of Benn’s liberal sentiment. For example, she talked at length about the “dodgy dossier” used by Tony Blair to make the case for war, and why he should be “taken to a war crimes trial in the Hague”.
But who does she think polices “international law”? Last time I checked, the United Nations was a cartel run by the imperialist powers victorious in World War Two. Making no reference to socialism or workers in the Middle East, she did however attempt a “radical” pitch — “Those who support the right of Hezbollah and Hamas to fight back are characterised as extremists. If opposing the government is extremist, then we’re all extremists”.
The only person on the platform whose views were worthy of respect was Hassan Jumaa, leader of the militant Iraqi Federation of Oil Unions which has waged several strikes against privatisation and looting of Iraq’s major resource, demonstrating the potential of the working-class movement despite nightmarish circumstances. Although the union is non-sectarian and organises all oil workers, Jumaa seems to be influenced by the soft-Islamist Shi’ite Fadila group, and so said little about the workers’ movement’s opposition to clerical reaction in Iraq.
Instead, he focused on the question of the invasion and occupation of Iraq and the destruction the US and UK have unleashed. He commented that “the Iraqi workers will win victory for the oppressed Iraqi people” — given that the American mission’s success is reliant on stable control of Iraqi resources, strikes represent a significant challenge for the occupiers. Indeed, Jumaa’s attitude to the troops was stark, “you should not be taken in by those who say that the withdrawal of troops will bring death and destruction. The longer they, the source of death, stay, the worse it will get”, and said that at the last two May Days the union had raised a call for the troops to leave Iraq. Without doubt, this was an optimistic characterisation of events, but Jumaa’s understanding of the situation is certainly worthy of our attention.
Unfortunately, the audience was not allowed to ask any questions or make any comments, so we could not find out more about Jumaa’s support for political Islam or how workers organise against the home-grown bourgeoisie. After all, in the eyes of the Stop the War Coalition and its SWP and Stalinist leadership, letting activists talk to the leading trade unionist in Iraq is not as exciting as giving a platform for a fascist to rant in defence of Hezbollah. It seems that for these “socialists”, the workers’ movement is just one part of the cross-class spectrum of “The Movement”, and so giving a token ten minutes to someone like Hassan Jumaa is sufficient to cover their left flank.
Spokesman for terrorists” makes student address · Issue 864, by Portia Nicholson
Controversial editor of Hezbollah’s newspaper, Ibrahim Mousawi, speaks at Cardiff as part of a national anti-war campaign
Cardiff University hosted an evening with controversial speaker Ibrahim Mousawi, the editor of Hezbollah’s newspaper, in a World Against War event last week.
The event, which had been criticised beforehand by local media reports, saw leaders of social movements in the Middle East and Britain come together to discuss the occupation of Iraq. Chris Nineham, from the Stop the War Coalition, Hassan Juma’a, the President of Iraqi Oil Workers’ Union, and Prof. Justin Lewis, from Cardiff University School of Journalism, also spoke to an audience of over 200 people.
Held in the Law Building on Monday March 3, the speakers called for a complete end to the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as urging for opposition to be voiced concerning any attack against Iran. The speakers also discussed the broader struggle against war around the world and against continuing threats from the US administration. But the event had been submerged in negative media attention due to Mousawi’s attendance, focusing on how he had been previously dubbed “a spokesman for terrorists”.
In a national tour of the World Against War movement, which culminates in a worldwide day of protest, Mousawi left a trail of media upset in many of the towns he visited. One newspaper in Liverpool wrote: “A Middle East activist accused of defending the murder of women and children is coming to Liverpool.”
The Conservative Party, including leader David Cameron, has tried and failed to have Mousawi banned from Britain, saying that he is a “vicious anti-semite” and a supporter of terrorism. But Mousawi, who is banned from both France and Ireland, has denied that he is anti-semitic. He said: “People have the right to live in peace and without fear of their homes being invaded. “We must all denounce war and we must all fight together to stop the killing.”
He also made direct reference to the terrorist label imposed on him by government and media opposition, urging his audience to “make up their own minds” and research him. Dr Paul Mason, from Cardiff University School of Journalism, was critical of the event’s bad press. He said: “Had any of these people bothered to attend, they would have witnessed a moving, human account of what happens when a super-power chooses to invade your country on the spurious grounds of ‘regime change’.”  Dr Mason also stressed that journalists had misinterpreted Mousawi’s visit.
He said: “This wasn’t a call to arms, or a rallying cry for the psychotic and murderous, but two first-hand accounts of America’s and Israel’s brutal actions in Iraq and Lebanon. There’s your terrorism.” One of the organisers, Max Pettigrew, a PhD student at Cardiff University, was impressed with the turnout at the evening.
Speaking to gair rhydd he said: “The rally indicated how many people want an end to the wars on people in the Middle East and an end to the war on our minds in the UK.” He urged students to “keep active on campus” and to attend the upcoming anti-war demonstration in London on March 15.The rally will form part of a global day of protests and marks the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq.For more information visit www.stopwar.org.uk.

Middle East: Gunman who killed students previously arrested for Hezbollah ties
Rome, 7 March (AKI) - The Palestinian gunman from East Jerusalem who killed eight Israeli religious seminary students on Thursday, had been previously arrested in Israel for alleged ties with Lebanese Shia militant group Hezbollah. Ala Abu Dhein was arrested four months ago by Israeli forces in an inquiry which lasted two months and was accused of having ties with Hezbollah, an unnamed local source in the village of Jabal al-Mukabir told Adnkronos International (AKI). The sources say Abu Dhein was later released because of a lack of evidence against him. Also on Thursday, Israeli security forces arrested members of Abu Dhein's family and friends.20-year-old Abu Dhein worked in the seminary as a bus driver and was a resident of Jerusalem and thus held a blue identity card allowing him to work and reside in Israel. Initially, the Jerusalem attack against the seminary had been claimed by the Galilee Freedom Battalions - the Martyrs of Imad Mughniyeh, reported Hezbollah Television station al-Manar. Imad Mughniyeh was killed in a bombing in Damascus on 13 February and Hezbollah, Syria and Iran blamed Israel for assassinating him. Hezbollah has vowed to avenge Mughniyeh's murder. Mughniyeh was the intelligence chief of Hezbollah's shady military wing, the Islamic Resistance.  Meanwhile, Israel raised its terror alert and sealed off the West Bank until Sunday, while the number of checkpoints in Jerusalem has been increased.

Analysis: Hezbollah gets a billion dollar subsidy from Iran
Dr. Walid Phares
06 Mar 2008
Beirut- A few weeks ago, articles published around the world reported that Hezbollah is undergoing two major changes. Both portend greater violence from the Iranian-sponsored global terrorist network.
The first change is a shift in leadership responsibilities. A report published initially in the Saudi owned Sharq al Awsat said the office of Ayatollah Khomenei appointed deputy secretary general Sheikh Naim Qassim as the new supreme commander of Hezbollah forces and the personal representative of the Ayatollah in Lebanon. Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, according to this report remains as secretary general of the organization. Sources said this change in control and command is because of "differences in opinions" between Narsrallah and Qassim.
The Hezbollah media arm rushed to deny the veracity of this shift. But observers with direct knowledge of the organization's inside structure said Khamenei indeed ordered changes in Hezbollah's structures, but not because of differences between its leaders. They said it was in preparation for a potential massive move by Hezbollah to seize more power in Lebanon and before a possible clash with the Lebanese Government and the United Nations over the disarmament process.
Sources believe the assassination of Brigadier General Francois Hajj, director of operations in the Lebanese Army was another preemptive measure ordered by the Pasdaran command in Lebanon. Hajj was slated to become the next commander of the Lebanese Army. The latter was to deploy across Lebanon and eventually begin the collection of weapons. Hence, believe the observers, a Syro-Iranian order was issued to preempt and eliminate a man who could have become the military commander to force Hezbollah to disarm. This would have been compared to the al Qaeda elimination of Masoud Shah in September 2001 just before the 9/11 strikes. Hence, the concerns that the assassination and the reshuffling within the organization may be a prelude to dramatic move by the Iranian funded Terror group. Which lead to the other important information revealed by al Shaq al Awsat and published in the leading Lebanese Newspaper al Nahar.
The second major change according to these reports Hezbollah is a huge increase in annual budget funded by Tehran. Hezbollah’s funding was elevated from $400 million US to $1 billion. This ballistic leap would enable the organization to crush any opponent inside Lebanon and engage in worldwide operations against Western Democracies and Arab moderates. According to experts in Lebanon, the $400 millions figure was enough to pay for hundreds of social centers and thousands of salaries enough to insure a full control over the Shia community, its representatives in Parliament and buy significant influence inside the Sunni, Druze and particularly Christian community. One hundred million dollars alone, could pay for the activities of movements opposed to the Cedars Revolution and the democratically elected Government of Siniora.
Hezbollah obtained support in the Christian districts and launched media outlets across the country. Another thirty millions can put enormous pressures on soldiers and officers of the various sectors of defense and security. In return the Government branches and the military have been deprived from solid financial support coming from outside the country. Those who rose against the Syrian occupation were mostly from the deprived and oppressed segments of civil society. And those who dared opposing Hezbollah's domination of the country lacked the basic means of NGOs. The confrontation was totally unbalanced. Iran was pouring 400 millions of Petrodollars to roll back the Cedars Revolution while the latter was highly praised overseas but wasn't a recipient of freedom funds.
But if $400 million can buy Hezbollah a magic place under Lebanon's sun, what would a $1 billion do? Observers in Lebanon say: "anything anywhere." Indeed the Moguls of the so-called "resistance" have been able to create alternative TV and radio stations, launch multiple dailies, pay for a nonstop sit-in across Downtown Beirut, and more importantly leap to hyper international power. Over the past year the Iranian-funded hydra is said to have hired PR companies from Beirut to major capitals to wage the mother of all wars of ideas not just against the vulnerable Cedars Revolution in Lebanon but also in defense of Ahmedinijad's nuclear strategy. Indeed, stories filed out of Tehran can't be credible.
But reports and analysis sprayed from dozens of apparently neutral web sites or forwarded from credible journalistic sources can do devastation in the West. And what better launching pad than Beirut, cultural capital of the Arab world, to use? All what the Iranian funded organization has to do is to "double" if not "triple" the income of any person of interest in any sector of choice: media, academia, military, consulting, intelligence, etc. both in Lebanon but also around the world, including if needed in the United States.
One Billion dollars spent on Hezbollah in Lebanon can have ripple effects as far as Detroit and Argentina. There is no native force in Lebanon that can match this tidal wave nor even one tenth of it. This is Iran's Petro power deployed on the Eastern Mediterranean not a local social movement building orphanages. A month ago as I was participating in a cross fire program on al Jazeera facing off with a coordinator of Iranian propaganda in the Arab world, I was asked why the US maintains a Navy in the Middle East. "Where are Iran's fleets," he asked. I replied that the Iranian regime maintains land fleets. "Hezbollah's 30,000 rockets and its millions of dollars is an Iranian fleet" I answered.
* Dr Walid Phares, author of Future Jihad: Terrorist Strategies against America, of The war of Ideas: Jihadism against democracy and of the forthcoming book, The Confrontation.

ICEJ STATEMENT ON JERUSALEM YESHIVA ATTACK
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FRIDAY, 7 MARCH 2008
ICEJ STATEMENT ON JERUSALEM YESHIVA ATTACK
The International Christian Embassy Jerusalem utterly condemns the appalling terrorist attack on a landmark Jerusalem yeshiva on Thursday evening.
Like the Passover seder bombing of late March 2002, this despicable assault on students at a revered institute of Jewish learning in the name of the Palestinian cause has taken deliberate aim at sacred Jewish traditions, said Rev. Malcolm Hedding, ICEJ executive director.
While Israel takes great care in keeping innocent civilians out of the conflict, these Arab terrorist elements take direct aim at them, having no regard for the weak, the unarmed and that which is holy to others, continued Hedding.
We extend our deepest condolences to the families of those who lost loves ones in this horrendous shooting massacre, and pray for a speedy recovery of those wounded. We also want to reassure the people of Israel of our abiding support and concern as they struggle on against such callous terrorism amid a world that rarely understands the evil you face nor appreciates how gallantly you confront it, said Hedding.


Slaughtering civilians does nothing to serve the Palestinian cause
By The Daily Star
Saturday, March 08, 2008
Editorial
The general right of Palestinians to resist occupation is enshrined in international law, and the specific impulse to avenge the past week's atrocities in the Gaza Strip is perfectly understandable, but those who exercise these prerogatives have a responsibility to choose targets that will not undermine their cause. Thursday night's shooting attack on a Jewish seminary in West Jerusalem, which killed eight young civilians, did not meet that standard. Its effect will be to damage the interests of the Palestinian people, including those who, like the gunman, hold Israeli identification documents.
There are contrary arguments, but none are very realistic. Some will argue that because military service is mandatory for virtually all Jewish citizens of Israel, all of them are legitimate targets. But this approach ignores the fact that the civilians in question were in a library, not waging war for the Jewish state. Others will point out that while yeshiva students like those who were killed on Thursday are commonly granted exemptions from conscription, they contribute heavily to the conflict by helping to drive the so-called "settler movement" which protects and expands Israel's illegal colonization of occupied land. But killing them only causes more Israelis to acquiesce in the evil settlement project itself - and to demand that their government refuse to accept the compromises required if peace is ever to be achieved.
There are also those who will note that whatever tactics they use and whatever targets they select, armed Arabs will always be painted as terrorists by a good number of people in Israel and many other countries, especially the United States. That prophecy is probably accurate, but there is no point in guaranteeing its fulfilment by providing convenient propaganda to those who would benefit from it. And in any event, attacking civilians only increases the likelihood of yet another round of Israeli "retaliation" that can only result in more innocent victims on the Palestinian side.
Those who want to change the world - or even a small corner of it - have to accept a few of its practical realities or watch them become even solidly more entrenched. One of these is that a dead Israeli attracts more media attention than a dead Arab. Witness the war in Lebanon in 2006, when the lopsided civilian casualties did not stop Western television stations from pursuing their dogmatic version of "balanced coverage" by simply reporting the same Israeli ones over and over and over again to accompany the never-ending stream of dead and wounded innocents here.
These and other injustices will not be remedied by pretending they do not exist or by feeding the machine that propagates them. Their decisiveness can be eroded, however, by ensuring that when resistance is called for, it is carried out in a disciplined and professional manner against genuine military personnel. Admittedly, this can restrict one's operational flexibility and even make one more vulnerable: As Hizbullah discovered even before but especially after the 1996 April Understanding that committed both the resistance and Israel's occupation forces in South Lebanon to minimizing civilian casualties, the enemy can and will use the rules to protect himself, and/or openly break them when it suits him. In the long term, though, adhering to such standards increases the credibility of what is an unshakably legitimate cause: that of defending one's own land.

French foreign minister says Lebanon crisis can 'only be blamed on Lebanese'

By Hussein Abdallah
Daily Star staff
Saturday, March 08, 2008
BEIRUT: French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner on Friday blamed feuding Lebanese parties for the failure to implement the three-point Arab initiative to end Lebanon's protracted crisis. "The failure so far of different initiatives to resolve Lebanon's crisis is not to be blamed on Arabs or France or any other foreign party. It is only to be blamed on the Lebanese," Kouchner told a news conference in France. Only three weeks ahead of an upcoming Arab summit, scheduled for March 29 and 30 in Damascus, Lebanon has yet to be invited to the gathering.
But Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora told local newspaper As-Safir on Thursday that an invitation will be delivered to the Lebanese government after March 11, the date of a scheduled House session to elect a new president for Lebanon. Siniora said the invitation should be handed to the Lebanese government in Beirut through a Syrian minister. He added that the Lebanese Council of Ministers would collectively decide who will represent Lebanon at the summit.
Siniora played down the possibility that Moussa would return to Beirut soon and predicted the Arab League chief would send one of his assistants instead to tackle the issue of improving Lebanese-Syrian ties. Siniora on Friday contacted the Egyptian and Saudi foreign ministers and discussed with them the latest developments on the Lebanese and Arab scenes. Arab foreign ministers in Cairo on Wednesday asked Moussa to work to improve ties between Beirut and Damascus.
Moussa met US Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs David Welsh in Cairo on Thursday to discuss the ongoing Arab efforts aimed at ending Lebanon's political crisis, according to Egypt's MENA news agency. After the meeting, Welsh accused Syria of not committing to regional peace.
"Syria and peace do not go together," he told reporters. "The United States is not concerned about changing the Syrian regime, but is worried about the Syrian people," he added. Meanwhile, Hizbullah, a major ally of Damascus, accused the United States on Friday of declaring war against the Lebanese opposition.
The party's senior official Nawaf Moussawi said Hizbullah will fight to prevent US hegemony over Lebanon. Meanwhile, Moussa's assistant Hisham Youssef told Al-Arabiya satellite news television that the Arab summit is only conditioned by the rules set by the Arab League. "If a president is not elected on the due date, the invitation will be sent to the Lebanese Cabinet," he said.
Youssef added that it is up to the Lebanese government to decide on whom Lebanon's representative to the summit will be. "As far as I know, all Arab states will participate in the summit. However, the level of representation depends on the circumstances," he said. Youssef added that intensive efforts will be made in the coming days to ensure a solution to the Lebanese crisis. Leaders of Arab heavyweights Egypt and Saudi Arabia are not likely to attend the Arab summit if a Lebanese president is not elected by the end of March. But surprisingly on Thursday, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) said President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahayan will attend the Damascus summit. According to Syrian official sources, the leaders of 12 Arab states have confirmed their presence at the summit.
Meanwhile, an Arab diplomat in Beirut told the Central News Agency on Friday that "mounting Arab and international pressure on Syria might force it to facilitate the election of a Lebanese president ahead of the Damascus summit."Also on Friday, Former President Amine Gemayel said he was still hoping that a fresh Arab effort would help end Lebanon's protracted crisis. Gemayel had said earlier this week that the Arab initiative had reached a dead end. Meanwhile, Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea arrived in Washington on a scheduled visit after receiving an invitation from the US administration. Geagea, who is heading a delegation that includes Tourism Minister Joe Sarkis and MP Strida Geagea, is expected to meet a number of senior US officials in the coming days.

Muslim Radicals Kill Three Christians and Wound Dozens in Southern Ethiopia
Group Vows to Eradicate Christians from the Province
You are free to disseminate the following news. We request that you reference ICC (International Christian Concern) and include our web address www.persecution.org. Contact Darara Gubo, Regional Manager for Africa, 1-800-ICC (422)-5441, darara@persecution.org.
(March 7, 2008) The Washington-DC based human rights group, International Christian Concern (ICC) www.persecution.org has just learned that Muslim radicals killed three Christians and wounded dozens more on March 3, 2008, in the province of Nensebo in Southern Ethiopia.
To date, eight of the wounded have been taken to the town of Awassa in a neighboring province for hospitalization, while those who were seriously wounded were taken to Black Lion Hospital in Addis Ababa. Among the wounded are a police officer and a Christian whose hand was cut off by the radical Muslims.
According to ICC sources, Muslim radicals recently made a covenant to wipe out Christians from the Muslim-dominated province of Nensebo. As part of their agreement, they vowed to destroy churches in the area and threatened to attack any Christian group that does missionary work.
Christians and Muslims in Ethiopia had been living peacefully together until the arrival of Wahhabi Islam from Saudi Arabia. The spread of Wahhabism, fueled by financial support from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States, is radicalizing Muslims who are in turn increasingly hostile towards Christians.
Previous attacks by Muslim radicals have taken place further west in Ethiopia. This most recent attack occurred in the South, showing an increasing spread of Muslim radicalization throughout the country.
ICC would like to ask concerned parties to contact Ethiopian Embassies in their respective countries and call for the protection of Christians in Nensebo and other Muslim-dominated areas of the country, who are facing increased attacks from radical Muslims.
Ethiopian Embassies:
USA: (202) 364-1200
Canada: (613) 235-6637
UK: (020) 7838 3897
# # #
ICC is a Washington-DC based human rights organization that exists to help persecuted Christians worldwide. ICC delivers humanitarian aid, trains and supports persecuted pastors, raises awareness in the US regarding the problem of persecution, and is an advocate for the persecuted on Capitol Hill and the State Department. For additional information or for an interview, contact ICC at 800-422-5441.

Lebanese Strong Transparent Democracy Organization (LSTDO)
Lebanese current events of 5 March, 2008.
Reflexions on the political and economic Lebanese news.
Call for a Neutral Lebanon without any interference
from neighboring countries.
I - Facts:
1
After three years of political terrorism in Lebanon since United Nations 1559 Resolution in 2004, it is established that the blockages of the Lebanon State is organized by the dictatorial and hegemonic Syria regime, which uses the indoctrinated and organized terrorists in Lebanon since the occupation of Lebanon by Syria in 1976.
2
The democrats of the government group of March 14 have waited enough to preserve security of the citizens, by yielding to a number of demands from the pro Syrian armed Opposition under threats of civil war. But there is no good result. The blackmail of terrorists continues. The functioning of the Lebanon STATE is blocked. The population is terrorized. Lebanon 's economy is in ruins.
3
The draft of the Arab League to bring together heads of Arab States in Damascus at the end of March, 2008, reveals serious problems for Lebanon . Indeed, heads of political clans in Lebanon publicly declared they can’t find solution because of irreconcilable demands of some Arab States which are allies of different Lebanese factions who play with the lives of citizens inside Lebanon . The government majority dare not apply the Constitution and laws for presidential election because the pro Syrian armed Opposition threats creating a civil war and it is supported by the Syrian regime, which wants to have his authority in the functioning of the Lebanon STATE .
4
Mr. Bashar ASSAD, head of the Syrian regime, proposed to Mr Amr MOUSSA, secretary-general of the Arab League, the election of General Michel SOLEIMAN to the presidency of the Lebanese republic, but with a "neutral government" (Say paralyzed), to create a new electoral law based on the law of 1960 (which advantage Pro Syrians), and to organize early parliamentary elections in six months. Let's say that a electoral campaign where half of the Lebanese territory is terrorized by armed terrorist groups who murder Lebanese leaders does not allow a free and democrat elections. In total, the Syrian regime linked to assassinations in Lebanon want that the policy of Lebanese government be subject to its veto by the use of the representation of the Opposition into Lebanese government with a right to Blocking of any decision which would impede their interests. The destruction of recent democracy and independence in Lebanon is under way.
5
Mr. Amine GEMAYEL, the leader of the Kataeb Christian party, went to see the king of Saudi Arabia , Mr. Abdallah BEN ABDEL AZIZE, and to discus the ongoing Lebanese crisis and the blocking of the presidential election.
6
Mr. Ghafir SOLANA, European Union Safety Officer came to Beirut to explore the ideas of political leaders, calling for dialogues. The French diplomacy had not been able to find solutions of understanding before. All "Conciliators» finally understood that the blocking came from the Syrian interference in the Lebanese internal affairs.
7
Mr. AMR MOUSSA, after his failure findings in Beirut talks, receives these days, some "Special envoys" of Lebanese political leaders, who flock to Cairo to defend their "livelihood" policy in the sharing of the future Lebanese government!
8
Mr. Nabih BERRY, Speaker of Parliament, inducted by the Syrian regime before the withdrawal of the Syrian army from Lebanon, and the Pro Syrian armed Opposition defendant, continues to launch proposals and blackmail " presenting himself like a family father concerned for the public interests !", with his aim to protect the weapons of Hezbollah and the acquisition of veto over government decisions concerning United Nations resolutions on Lebanon. The Syrian regime is alarmed by the international tribunal for the assassination of Rafik HARIRI. The involvement of some leaders of the opposition in Lebanon is not excluded.
9
Mr. Samir GEAGEA, leader of the Lebanese Forces, declared his rejection of Lebanese participation in the Arab League Congress in Damascus , scheduled for the end of March 2008, whereas the Syrian regime is blocking the Lebanese presidential election.
10
The Maronite Patriarch, SFEIR, said to be for an electoral law based on the district, the 1960 election law has become outmoded in 2008. Half of the future Christians deputies are likely to be chosen by a Muslim electorate. And the rights of the Lebanese Christian culture will not be properly defended. Imbalance into Lebanese State would create social tensions and mistrusts between the communities.
11
The President, BUSCH, has reiterated its support for the Majority government in Lebanon and expresses his hostility against interference of the Syrian regime in the internal affairs of Lebanon . American President is on the side of Lebanese Democrats and the independence of Lebanon .
12
Mr. Ban KI MOON, Secretary General of UN, said the lack of cooperation of the Syrian regime in the Lebanese crisis. The UN troops in Lebanon are to assist the restoration of State authority and the citizens Security.
It is a duty of legitimate interference of the United Nations to protect a Democrat weak State.
13
The Foreign Ministers of Arab countries met in Cairo , on 5.3.2008. Their statement on the Lebanese crisis shows, apparently, they deal, with the same equality, Syrian regime who has murdered Lebanese in one hand, and the defenders of the Lebanese independent democracy in the other hand. They call for the abolition of the decision priority of the parliamentary and government Majority in the Lebanese future governmental authority! This failure was predictable. In fact, the differences are important between countries that support Lebanese government of Fouad SANIORA and those who do not want to oppose against Syrian hegemony in Lebanon .
14
On 5-3-2008, the Council of Maronite Patriarchs stated that the absence of President Election since November 2007 is an unacceptable shame.
15
In total, at the beginning of March 2008, all Lebanese state institutions are blocked. There is no Constitutional Council. Parliament is prevented to meet since seventeen months. Government is harassed by the armed opposition with threat of civil war. The President of the Republic post has been vacant since November 2007. The President election is blocked by the opposition and the Syrian regime interference. The heads of political clans accuse one the other through the Medias. All attempts of conciliation or agreement have failed. Citizens’ impoverishment doesn’t interest anybody in the politicized Medias which are servicing various political mafias. And, finally, most Lebanese politicians make us believe today that we must wait decisions of "funds and weapons regional Providers» to be able to hope for a solution.
In short, the Democrats among Lebanese leaders who want to apply the Constitution and Run public utilities are prevented to work by political armed mafia leaders who use blackmail and threats of Civil war.
II - LSTDO Position:
1
Simply, we are Lebanese citizens who want to work in peace to feed our families. The only solution for us is a true, transparent and strong democracy. We want it strong by its army, its security services, its judiciary apparatus, its administrative institutions and policies capable to stop corruption into the public services.
2
We strongly condemn the abandonment by the political representatives of the Lebanese people of their independence vis-à-vis foreign States, and their lack of simple application of the Constitution and other laws of the republic.
3
We condemn any bargaining and blackmail held with the mediation or interference from any non-democratic country or any neighbouring country regime.
4
We condemn all dealings with the Arab League on the pretext of waiting for an external response from non democratic country to solve the internal affairs of Lebanon .
5
We call upon neighbouring countries only their neutrality and their non interference in Lebanese affairs.
6
The functioning of the Lebanese State must begin with the daily opening of the Parliament to allow MPs to consult between them and decide on various laws and decisions in complete freedom.
7
The acceptable aids from foreign countries must be carried out only through the Lebanese State , to help fairly all Lebanese, to improve independence, democracy and the Lebanese living standards. The military support should be sought, if necessary, from friendly democratic countries and the United Nations Organization. No neighbouring country should have any influence on the Lebanese government and any presence of its troops on Lebanese soil.
8
We condemn all solutions which leaves on Lebanese soil hotbeds of armed groups without their direct and absolute control from the Lebanese state through its political institutions and its army.
9
A real democracy requires an electoral law that allows total freedom of citizens to choose a deputy well known in his territory. Deputy works only to defend the needs of the public services and the quality of citizens’ life. The small district, where only one MP represents several villages or small area of a city, is an ideal cutting for a true democracy. The election is made by three selecting rounds, at a simple majority. The most convincing and most trusted will win. The first four candidates from the rank of the first round may compete in the second round. The first two ranking for the second round compete in the third round. No ad hoc alliances or electorate purchases, or compromises, or corruptions are tolerated. The deputy will remain responsible for his commitments to his voters and the judiciary apparatus. He’s not accountable to the party leaders or clans or indoctrinated sects or religions.
10
Given the multi-cultural particularities in Lebanon , with ramification of religious manipulation by countries in the Middle East , the removal of distrust between citizens of different origins, on a racial or cultural or religious or doctrinal plan, needs in the electoral law a balance between the numbers of deputies of different denominational backgrounds. The two main religious orientations are Islam and Christianity. The balance in Lebanon imposes equal numbers of deputies between Christians and Muslims. We propose that the parliament would consist of 25% of Maronite Christian deputies, 25% of non-Maronite Christian deputies, 20% of Shiite deputies, 20% of Sunni deputies and 10% of Druze deputies. The distributions on the land and subdivisions of religious affiliations are to be organized by the parliament for the final text of the new electoral law. Deputies are elected by the citizens regardless of religious interference. The religious balance of the State leaders is not intended to devote to the confessionals. Its sole aim is to remove mistrust between the Lebanese who are concerned about the hegemony of a religious clan on the other components of the multi faith Lebanese society.
11
Complete secularism in Lebanon is not possible, because of the current Lebanese mentality. A democracy in a nation obsessed with religions lead to a power of a dictator belonging to the largest religious community. The majority of Lebanese currently prefer their religious and ethnic affiliation instead of the geographical laic Phoenicia . Faced with ethnic threats, Lebanese prefer to take refuge in religion and forget to defend the rest of social problems and living expenses. This threatens to divide Lebanon as a result of different religious or cultural extensions to the regional Middle Eastern countries.
12
We strongly condemn any proposal for proportional in the electoral law. The proportional benefit is for the continuation of feudalism and their grip on the state budget by heads of clans or political mafias. The proportional assured the head of a clan or party its power to keep some power over the state and the possibility of choosing his "collaborators" Deputies who become his servants instead of the citizens services and the general interest of the country. The proportional gives a carte blanche to the heads of political mafias who will continue to fight for share looting of the state budget as some do it now. We want deputies totally free to choose conscientious solutions and without referring to the heads of clans. The heads of political groups in parliament will be chosen by the members and not the contrary. The current paralysis of parliament comes from the fact that political leaders had nominated their candidates for the National Assembly. And, subsequently, Congressman feels indebted to his chief of the clan in all circumstances!
13
The acceleration of democratic reforms depends on the degree of freedom of the deputies compared to the hegemony of political and feudal current leaders in Lebanon . If these leaders continue to influence the management of the Lebanese State , we believe that the democratic revolution in Lebanon will be restrained or lost.
14
A good electoral law as cited above will also reduce the risks of political terrorism. Indeed, the key decisions for the country's future will be taken collectively by all the deputies. Assassinations and blackmail no longer be able to influence the choice of the Lebanese State policy.
15
We can also expect a democratic electoral law to reduce any risk of seizure of power by a dictator, by avoiding power concentration into a few people hands.
16
The Cedar Revolution must resume its torch. Share the government in the current situation with pro-Syrian Lebanese is a defeat for democracy in Lebanon which could put Lebanon under Syrian domination.
17
We demand the closure of borders with Syria pending a diplomatic normalization and respect for the independence of Lebanon by this country. Trade with the Middle East countries should be organized by sea.
18
We condemn any presence of political representative of the Lebanese State at the meeting of the Arab League in Damascus scheduled for late March 2008, even though there has been elected president of the republic. We will not visiting our murderers. We will await the opening of the Embassy of Lebanon in Damascus before any negotiations with the government of Syria .
19
In response to the news where we learn that the Arab League was in the process to ask Mr Bashar Assad, President of the Syrian regime, to resolve the political crisis of the Lebanese deadlock of the presidential election by the armed pro-Syrian Lebanese, we say that in a democracy, a neighbouring State has no opinion to offer in all matters concerning Lebanon and its government. For Lebanese who commit illegal actions, we call upon the United Nations, the Lebanese army and friendly countries to prevent them from harming.
20
When the majority of political leaders in Lebanon today hope to elect General Michel SOLEIMAN as a "neutral" or "consensus" president for the presidency of the republic, the ignorance by the LSTDO of his political programme or his project concerning the major questions posed currently does not allow us to be supportive of that choice. He was appointed head of the army by the Syrian regime at a time when Syria 's Secret Service murdered innocent Lebanese and terrorized all Lebanese. To date, he gives the impression that he will not deal with armed groups on Lebanese soil and especially Hezbollah. It will not restore the Lebanese State authority without compliance with the Security Council resolutions of the United Nations and the disarmament of all militias on Lebanese soil.
21
We want a Democratic president from the majority in parliament, even if he is elected by a simple majority that the text of the Constitution allows, in the second round of balloting. The agreement is a good thing; a qualified majority of two-thirds is also good. But we must not leave a people to drift because of a handful of heads of political mafias who are struggling to preserve their power with attracting foreign interferences. We are not ruled by a dictator, but by many small local dictators who are fighting for their private interests. Finally, the best democracies in the world accept the authority of a president elected by 51% of voters. The real democratic rule must prevail in Lebanon . The rule of selection by the democratic vote is the best option to choose the best solutions in a free society without any blocking of the functioning of the state.